Refused Study Permit
Study permit refusals have reached record highs in Canada. If your application was refused, you are far from alone — and you have options. The MyVisa Team is one of Canada's most experienced practices in study permit judicial reviews, with a track record that speaks for itself.
Our Track Record
Canada's leaders in study permit judicial reviews.
400+
Study Permit Judicial Reviews Filed
90%+
Success Rate for Applicants
#1
Focus area for international students
The MyVisa Team has filed over 400 judicial reviews of refused study permit decisions at Federal Court and is a leading immigration law firm in Canada for Judicial Review of Study Permit refusals. Our success rate of over 90% for applicants reflects not just our legal expertise, but our deep understanding of how IRCC assesses study permit applications, where officers make errors, and how to build the most compelling legal argument for your case.
When your education and your future in Canada are on the line, experience and results matter. This is what we do.
The Current Reality of Study Permit Processing in 2026
Study permit refusals have reached historic highs. Here is what the data shows.
If your study permit was refused, you are part of an unprecedented wave of rejections that has fundamentally changed the landscape of Canadian international education.
65%
Study permit refusal rate in 2025, up from 40.5% just two years earlier
52%
Of all study permit applications refused in 2024, up from 38% in 2023
30%
Approval rate through June 2025, down from 51% the same period in 2024
290K+
Study permit applications refused in the 2024 calendar year alone
These numbers reflect a deliberate and significant policy shift. Canada's Immigration Levels Plan has introduced strict caps on the number of study permits issued each year, and IRCC is applying far greater scrutiny to every application it receives. Approval rates that hovered around 60% for most of the previous decade have collapsed in the space of two years. For applicants from countries such as India, which accounts for approximately 40% of Canada's international student population, the situation is even more stark, with four out of five Indian applicants receiving rejections in the second quarter of 2025.
This is not a system where a technically complete application is enough to secure approval. It is a system where the strength of your legal strategy, and the experience of the team behind it, makes all the difference.
The Role of AI and Automation
Automation is driving refusals that have nothing to do with the merits of your application.
Behind the refusal rate numbers is a less visible but critically important factor: the role of AI-assisted processing tools, most notably Chinook, in how IRCC assesses study permit applications. Chinook and related automation tools are used to screen, sort, and in some cases effectively decide the outcome of applications at scale. These systems assess applications against risk profiles and statistical patterns that may have nothing to do with the individual merits of your case.
The result is a growing category of refusals where a well-prepared, complete, and legally sound application is refused because an automated system flagged it based on broad country-of-origin patterns, financial profiles, or other algorithmic risk factors. Officers reviewing these flagged files often provide only generic refusal reasons, making it difficult for applicants to understand what actually went wrong.
This is one of the most significant and least understood developments in Canadian immigration law. The MyVisa Team has developed specific expertise in identifying AI-influenced refusals, interpreting the officer notes behind them through Access to Information requests, and building judicial review applications that directly challenge the legality and procedural fairness of these decisions.
If your application was complete, well-documented, and still refused, then automation may be the reason. And judicial review may be the remedy.
Common Reasons for Refusal
Study permit refusal rates have risen sharply in recent years. Understanding the most common grounds for refusal, and how to address them, is essential to putting together an application that has a genuine chance of approval.
Failure to establish genuine student intent
Officers must be satisfied that you are a genuine student with a credible reason for choosing Canada, your specific institution, and your specific program. Applications that do not provide a coherent, well-supported study plan that connects your academic background, your program choice, and your career goals, are routinely refused on this basis.
What to do: Invest in a detailed and personalized study plan. Generic statements about wanting to study in Canada are not enough. Your plan should explain your academic history, why this program at this institution makes sense for your goals, and what you intend to do with your education.
Insufficient financial evidence
Financial requirements for study permit applications have increased significantly in recent years to reflect rising costs of living in Canada and are expected to continue rising. Applications that rely on outdated financial benchmarks, or that fail to provide clear and credible documentation of available funds, are at serious risk of refusal. Providing proof of your financial ability includes evidence to show both the available funds as well as the source of your funds.
What to do: Use current IRCC financial thresholds at the time of your application. Provide comprehensive, well-organized financial documentation that clearly demonstrates you have sufficient funds for tuition, living expenses, and return travel, as well as the source of the funds.
Failure to demonstrate temporary intent
Officers must be satisfied that you intend to leave Canada when your study permit expires. Applicants from countries with high rates of overstays in Canada or with limited ties to their home country face heightened scrutiny on this point. Weak ties to your home country, in terms of family, employment, property, or financial obligations, can lead to refusal even when other aspects of your application are strong.
What to do: Build a compelling picture of your ties to your home country and your reasons for returning after your studies. Evidence matters more than assertions.
AI-influenced refusals and automated processing
IRCC uses AI-assisted tools including Chinook in the processing of study permit applications. These systems assess applications against risk profiles and can flag or refuse applications in ways that do not reflect the actual merits of an individual case. Applicants from certain countries are disproportionately affected. A technically complete application is not always enough. Automated systems can still produce unjust outcomes, and applicants need to be aware of this reality when planning their study permit journey.
The MyVisa Team has developed a deep understanding of how Chinook and related tools operate and how they affect study permit decisions. If your application is refused despite being complete and well-prepared, an AI-influenced decision may be a factor, and a judicial review may be the appropriate response. Given that judicial reviews take time, it is important to factor this possibility into your timeline from the outset.
What to do: Prepare your application with automated review in mind. If refused, obtain your IRCC notes through an ATIP request before deciding on next steps. Contact the MyVisa Team to assess whether a judicial review is warranted.
Prior refusals and immigration history
A history of prior refusals, whether for a study permit or any other Canadian visa, will be visible to the reviewing officer and will weigh against a new application unless directly and convincingly addressed. Attempting to minimize or conceal prior refusals is considered misrepresentation and will make your situation significantly worse.
What to do: Address prior refusals directly and honestly in your new application. Explain what has changed since your previous application and why the officer's earlier concerns no longer apply.
Your Options After A Study Permit Refusal
Choosing the right one depends entirely on the specific circumstances of your refusal. This is why a legal assessment before you act is essential, the wrong path wastes time and may close off better options.
Option 1 - Judicial Review at Federal Court
If the officer made a legal error, applied the wrong standard, failed to consider relevant evidence, or if your refusal was influenced by automated processing that did not give your application genuine individual consideration, a judicial review at Federal Court is likely your strongest option. The MyVisa Team has filed over 400 study permit judicial reviews with a success rate of over 90%. This is the path we are built for.
Option 2 - Request Reconsideration
In very limited circumstances, it may be possible to request that IRCC reconsider its decision. Given the high volume of applications and the nature of bulk refusals, this option is often ineffective and should only be considered where the error in the refusal is entirely clear and unambiguous. For example, where your application clearly included a letter of acceptance that the officer claimed was missing. The MyVisa Team will advise you on whether reconsideration is worth pursuing in your specific case.
Option 3 - Reapply
If your application was genuinely incomplete, such as missing required documents, insufficient financial evidence, or a poorly prepared study plan, a new and significantly stronger application may be the right next step. Reapplying with the same application will not produce a different result. A strategic reapplication requires a clear understanding of what went wrong and a deliberate plan to fix every issue before resubmitting.
Not sure which option is right for you?
Start with a free assessment of your refusal. We will review your ODNs and your application, identify the strongest available path, and give you an honest recommendation on how to proceed.
Judicial review deadlines are strict
An application for leave to commence a judicial review must be filed within 15 days of the refusal for decisions made inside Canada, and within 60 days for decisions made outside Canada. These deadlines cannot be extended. If you are considering judicial review, contact the MyVisa Team immediately after receiving your refusal.
Understanding Your Study Permit Refusal - Officer Decision Notes (ODNs)
Your refusal comes with Officer Decision Notes. Here is what they actually tell you.
Starting in 2025, IRCC began providing Officer Decision Notes (ODNs) alongside refusal letters. This was intended to give applicants more transparency about why their application was refused. In practice, however, ODNs are largely generated by Chinook and other automated processing tools, and they tend to reflect the same generic refusal language found in the refusal letter itself rather than a genuine individualized assessment of your application.
What ODNs can tell us, when reviewed alongside the documents you submitted, is whether the officer's stated reasons are actually supported by your application, and whether there is a meaningful gap between what your application contained and what the officer claimed to find. That gap is often where the legal error lives.
The MyVisa Team reviews every refused study permit client's ODNs together with their complete submitted application. This review tells us whether your case has a strong basis for judicial review, whether the officer's findings are defensible, and what arguments are most likely to succeed in Federal Court. It is the foundation of everything we do on refused study permit files.
The Judicial Review Process - Step by Step
What a study permit judicial review actually looks like.
No two cases are identical, but the judicial review process at Federal Court generally follows these steps. Understanding the timeline and what happens at each stage helps you plan, academically and personally, while your case proceeds.
1. We initiate the judicial review and request the internal record
We file at Federal Court within the required deadline and simultaneously request all internal IRCC notes related to your refusal.
2. We review the record and prepare legal submissions
We review your ODNs, your submitted application, and the full internal record. We then prepare our written legal arguments identifying why the officer's decision was wrong and should be set aside.
3. We attempt to settle with the government
Before completing the legal submissions in the Court, we seek to resolve the matter. A large majority of our cases settle at this stage or shortly after, typically within three to four months of initiating the review.
If settled: your application is returned to IRCC for fresh consideration by a different officer. The judicial review process is complete.
4. If no settlement, the matter proceeds to a Federal Court judge
We file our complete submissions with the Court. The government responds. A judge reviews the written record and decides whether to grant an oral hearing or dismiss the application. If dismissed at this stage, no written reasons are given and the process concludes.
5. If a hearing is granted, we appear before the Court
We update our submissions and appear before a Federal Court judge to present your case and respond to the judge's questions. The hearing judge issues a written decision, typically within a few weeks.
If the judicial review is granted: your application is returned to IRCC for fresh consideration by a different officer, the same result as a settlement. The Court does not direct how the officer must decide your case.
While the majority of our Judicial Review applications settle, some of the recent decisions for our clients include:
- Rabiei v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1295
- Mehrara v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 1554
- Shirazi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 822
- Jahanian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 581
- Yani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 73
- Mouivand v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 573
Refused a Canadian study permit? Act quickly as strict deadlines apply.
The MyVisa Team has helped over 400 refused study permit applicants challenge their decisions at Federal Court, with a success rate of over 90%. Start with a free assessment and find out whether judicial review, a fresh application, or a combination of both is the right path for you.